The 3NT opening in MAF is the so-called "gambling" 3NT. I could not get myself to passing over this opening bid. So I stuck to the old gambling 3NT, which, unless it nearly never occurs, still is noted on many couple's system-cards and it is included in MAF too.
In order to be complete, I made next little diagram as an illustration of the convention:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| return to : LINKS GENERAL OVERVIEWS |
If you arrived here because you wanted to read about the "sohl principle" then we give you the opportunity to link to various other paragraphs where remarks are made about "sohl":
| 1§-Sohl | 1¨-Sohl | 1©-Sohl | 1ª-Sohl | 1NT-Sohl | 2©/ª-Sohl | 2NT-Sohl |
| the SOHL overview | ||||||
I was not able to devise something "originally new" (or funny or practical) for this opening bid. I simply could not stop at 3ª, a strange cause but it is "originally true".
I never told you anything from my limited bridge experience (elsewhere I told you that I learned playing bridge about 50 years ago, but I did not tell you that during the past 50 years there were at least 35 years, that I at did not play bridge at all, so my experiences are really limited). I believe that my experiences, at least those few things that I remember, are not representative for the general game of bridge. But now I will make one exception and tell you something. I encountered once the the chance of practicing the convention, and that turned out to be a disaster. We "went into the boat" (like we say in such circumstances in Holland) in a terrible way - in better english you could say: "the odds pulled our legs mercilessly" - The score was "about 10 tricks down". Nevertheless this experience will not keep me from doing it again, if there is a chance to try it.